Rule of Law in any given country is crucial more so for those that observe the Democratic Principles. Fiji was ceeded to Great Britain in 1874. Thus began the long painstaking conversation and involvement to draw up some rules and guidelines to protect the 'Vanua, Lotu kei na Matanitu'.
Fiji gained Independence from Great Britain in 1974 in earnest. We are infomed that this was étorced onto the people of Fiji. One segment pushed for a breakaway from Britain while the Indigenous Fijians and their Chiefs were quite happy to stay within the Realm of the Commonwealth. This became evident with the signing of The Wakaya Letter. The rest if now history.
Fiji has been riddled with coup détat from 1987 by Sitiveni Rabuka followed by George Speight coup in 2000. The worst of all these coup maniacs is Frank Bainimarama's 2006 coup. This has turned Fiji upside down. The SunniMuslim Sunset Clause Agenda became their platform for change for a new Fiji which is really shaping Fiji to be a little Muslim Isles in the Pacific. The excuse was we need to create equal citizenry, reduced the Fijians to backseat as they have had the joy of front row seat for so long. Let us steal their Fiji Race identity while we are there. And so they did. Guess where Fiji is at 10 years later? The same coupster and his cronies that have held onto to power since 2006 are still here at the helm. Perhaps, Bainimarama & his followers wanted to emulate dictators that stay in perpetual power. Who knows? One thing we are certain of, emerging from the shadows are international players/actors like European Union and United Nations. These are the two agencies in cohuts and promoting the sunni agenda in Fiji. All one has to do is take a quick look at what they have done in Fiji and it is always aligned with Sunni Agendas. The players in Fiji they are constantly photographed with are Sunnis. The NGOs they support are recommended to them by Sunnis. These two agencies EU & UN basically are Khaiyum's lapdogs in Fiji. Now they have their greedy eyes in the Pacific. Let's tell these two clowns EU-UN that we'd rather be poor than take their bloodmoney.
So in short, take a good look at the excerpt below lifted from Alison Learning on "Various Mechanisms of Dispute Resolutions". It shows Parliament as first up where Law is made. Well that is in an even Democracy where Rule of Law is balanced or we hope it is. In Fiji Democracy is a farce. It is only for show. Deep within there are Sunni worms crawling all over. All one has to do is take a snapshot view of what has occurred post 2006 through to 2016, its weaks of dodgy deals, corruptions, nepotism and more. This blog opt to steer clear of the twists and turns of Bainimarama regime and his dodgy actors as their acts of deception in Fiji and the world is now public knowledge.
Read the excerpt and make a comparison to what is happening in Fiji today from 2006 through to 2016 + .
Comment or email us your thoughts.
Vinaka
NaDina Team.
Various Mechanisms in the Dispute Resolution Framework
Example of the links between various mechanisms in the dispute resolution framework:
Parliament
Police and law enforcement agencies
Courts
The traditional court hierarchy is the major forum for dispute resolution within the legal system, and is often used when other (alternative) methods of dispute resolution fail or are inadequate for the purposes of justice. Each court in the traditional hierarchy has its own particular jurisdiction (e.g. the High Court of Australia (HCA) is the only court that resolves constitutional disputes). The courts are the mechanisms where: (1) accusations of wrongful conduct (civil wrongs) and (2) alleged law-breakers (criminal) are legally processed. They are presided over by qualified and skilled personnel who have considerable expertise in the law. The traditional courts are arranged in a hierarchy which makes the dispute-settling process more efficient by offering degrees of specialisation in the resolution of particular types of disputes, allowing a system of appeals to operate, and facilitating the use of the doctrine of precedent in law-making. The courts' main function is to resolve disputes by punishing wrongdoers, enforcing obligations and protecting individual rights.
|